Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 8.232
1.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(5): e124-e126, 2024 05 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709684

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic medication for the treatment of various autoimmune conditions. A rare side effect of HCQ is thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). We present two cases of patients who developed purpura that did not meet TTP criteria following treatment with HCQ. While the etiology of HCQ-associated TTP is poorly understood, we propose a spectrum of manifestations related to HCQ, ranging from benign purpura to TTP. As multiple factors contribute to the disease, we believe that HCQ may act as a "second hit" in patients with genetic susceptibility, which also influences the variability in the severity of disease manifestations. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(5):e124.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7781e.


Antirheumatic Agents , Hydroxychloroquine , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Hydroxychloroquine/administration & dosage , Female , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Male , Adult , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/chemically induced , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/diagnosis
3.
Clin Exp Med ; 24(1): 97, 2024 May 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727756

Data on the safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in patients with renal impairment are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the safety of JAKis compared to biological (b) DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and renal impairment. We used a multi-centre observational registry of patients with RA in Japan (the ANSWER cohort). We assessed the drug retention rates of b/targeted synthetic DMARDs with different modes of action (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), immunoglobulins fused with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4-Ig), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ris), and JAKis) in patients with RA stratified by pre-treatment estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. The time to discontinuation of bDMARDs or JAKis was analysed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model This study included 3775 patients, who were classified into three groups (the normal group (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2): 2893 patients; CKDa group (eGFR 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2): 551; and CKDb group (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2): 331). In the CKDb group, the 12-month drug retention rate due to adverse events (AE) was the lowest in patients treated with JAKi (TNFi: 93.1%; IL-6Ri: 94.1%; CTLA-4-Ig: 92.3%; JAKi: 75.1%). In the normal and CKDa groups, drug retention rates due to AE were similar among patients treated with bDMARDs and JAKi. In contrast, drug retention rates due to inefficacy were similar between bDMARDs and JAKis in all groups. In the Cox-proportional model, in the CKDb group, TNFi, IL-6Ri, and CTLA-4-Ig showed lower incidence of drug discontinuation due to AE than JAKis (TNFi: hazard ratio = 0.23 (95% confidence interval 0.09-0.61), IL-6Ri: 0.34 (0.14-0.81), CTLA-4-Ig: 0.36 (0.15-0.89)). JAKis showed the lowest drug retention due to AE in patients with moderate-to-severe and severe renal impairment (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). Physicians should pay more attention to renal function when using JAKis than when using bDMARDs.


Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Japan , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Renal Insufficiency/chemically induced , Adult , Cohort Studies , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Biological Products/adverse effects
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2410677, 2024 May 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722628

Importance: The major toxic effect of hydroxychloroquine is retinopathy. Thus, current guidelines recommend limiting the dose and screening annually for retinopathy among all long-term users, but individual patient factors may be associated with retinopathy risk. Objective: To identify risk factors beyond hydroxychloroquine dose and duration of use for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of 4677 patients in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California integrated health network who initiated hydroxychloroquine, continued treatment, and underwent retinopathy screening after 5 years of use was conducted from July 1, 1997, to December 31, 2020, with up to 15 years of follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed in August 2023. Exposure: Candidate risk factors included age at hydroxychloroquine initiation, sex, race and ethnicity, indications, chronic kidney disease (CKD), liver disease, diabetes, tamoxifen use, and medications that interact with hydroxychloroquine metabolism. Hydroxychloroquine dose was assessed from pharmacy dispensing records. Main Outcome and Measures: Incident hydroxychloroquine retinopathy was adjudicated from masked review of guideline-recommended screening studies and classified as parafoveal or pericentral pattern. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess potential risk factors for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy within 15 years of initiation. Results: Of 4677 long-term hydroxychloroquine users (mean [SD] age at initiation, 52.4 [14.1] years; 3877 women [82.9%]), 125 patients developed hydroxychloroquine retinopathy within 15 years (102 parafoveal, 23 pericentral). Older age at time of hydroxychloroquine initiation was associated with retinopathy risk, with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.48 (95% CI, 1.28-4.78) for those aged 45 to 54 years, 3.82 (95% CI, 2.05-7.14) for those aged 55 to 64 years, and 5.68 (95% CI, 2.99-10.79) for those aged 65 years or older compared with those younger than 45 years. The risk of retinopathy was higher among females than males (HR, 3.83 [95% CI, 1.86-7.89]), among patients with CKD stage 3 or greater (HR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.25-3.04]), and among individuals with tamoxifen use (HR, 3.43 [95% CI, 1.08-10.89]). The likelihood of pericentral retinopathy was higher among Asian patients (HR, 15.02 [95% CI, 4.82-46.87]) and Black patients (HR, 5.51 [95% CI, 1.22-24.97]) compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that increasing age, female sex, CKD stage 3 or greater, and tamoxifen use were associated with a higher risk of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy, whereas being younger than 45 years at hydroxychloroquine initiation and male sex were associated with a lower risk. Race and ethnicity were also associated with the pattern of retinopathy. These factors should be incorporated into hydroxychloroquine dosing decisions.


Hydroxychloroquine , Retinal Diseases , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retinal Diseases/chemically induced , Retinal Diseases/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Aged , Cohort Studies , Adult , California/epidemiology , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects
6.
Skin Res Technol ; 30(5): e13718, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700458

INTRODUCTION: Due to the increasing prevalence of immune-mediated diseases such as psoriasis, lichen planus, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologists have turned to new biologic drugs known as DMARDs (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) in recent years. AREAS COVERED: In this study, we evaluate the immune-mediated dermatological side effects of DMARDS by reviewing and analyzing previous peer-reviewed research on the effects of TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of skin diseases, as well as adverse effects of these drugs and some of the main causes of these effects. EXPERT OPINION: DMARDs are very effective in improving control of the above diseases. TNF-α inhibitors are an important group of DMARDs that are widely used. The paradoxical adverse events (PAEs) associated with the use of TNF-α inhibitors are divided into three categories: true paradoxical, borderline paradoxical, and non-paradoxical. True PAEs include conditions for which TNF-α inhibitors are approved for treatment. Borderline PAEs are considered to occur with this class of drugs for which there is no definite approval but for which there is sufficient evidence. Although these events are rare, early recognition of the accused drug and appropriate decision-making may prevent progression of complications and irreversible side effects.


Antirheumatic Agents , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Humans , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Skin Diseases/immunology , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Drug Eruptions/immunology
7.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 144(6)2024 May 14.
Article En, Nor | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747669

Background: A woman in her seventies presented to the accident and emergency department (A&E) with shortness of breath that had increased over a period of three weeks. She had a history of COPD, hypertension and polymyalgia rheumatica. A medication error involving methotrexate, used for autoimmune diseases, was discovered during her medical history review. Case presentation: The patient arrived with stable vital signs, including 94 % oxygen saturation and a respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min. She had been taking 2.5 mg of methotrexate daily for the past three weeks instead of the prescribed weekly dose of 15 mg. Other examinations revealed no alarming findings, except for a slightly elevated D-dimer level. Interpretation: Considering her medical history and exclusion of other differential diagnoses, methotrexate toxicity was suspected. The patient was admitted to the hospital and intravenous folinic acid was initiated as an antidote treatment. Five days later, the patient was discharged with an improvement in the shortness of breath. This case underscores the importance of effective communication in health care, particularly in complex cases like this, where understanding dosages and administration is crucial. Medical history, clinical examinations and medication reviews, often involving clinical pharmacists, are vital in the A&E to reveal medication errors.


Medication Errors , Methotrexate , Humans , Female , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Aged , Dyspnea/chemically induced , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Antidotes/administration & dosage , Antidotes/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage
8.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1359041, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711497

Background: Immunotherapy targeting factors related to immune imbalance has been widely employed for RA treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose interleukin (IL)-2 combined with tocilizumab (TCZ), a biologics targeting IL-6, in RA patients. Methods: Fifty adults with active RA who met the criteria with complete clinical data were recruited, and divided into three groups: control group (n=15), IL-2 group (n=26), and IL-2+TCZ group (n=9). In addition to basic treatment, participants in the IL-2 group received IL-2 (0.5 MIU/day), while participants in the IL-2+TCZ group received IL-2 (0.5 MIU/day) along with one dose of TCZ (8 mg/kg, maximum dose: 800 mg). All subjects underwent condition assessment, laboratory indicators and safety indicators detection, and records before treatment and one week after treatment. Results: Compared with the baseline, all three groups showed significant improvement in disease conditions, as evidenced by significantly reduced disease activity indicators. The low-dose IL-2 and combination treatment groups demonstrated a violent proliferation of Tregs, while the absolute number of Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells in the latter group showed a decreasing trend. The decrease in the Th17/Treg ratio was more pronounced in the IL-2+TCZ groups. No significant adverse reactions were observed in any of the patients. Conclusion: Exogenous low doses of IL-2 combined TCZ were found to be safe and effective in reducing effector T cells and appropriately increasing Treg levels in RA patients with high effector T cell levels. This approach helps regulate immune homeostasis and contributes to the prevention of disease deterioration. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=13909, identifier ChiCTR-INR-16009546.


Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Drug Therapy, Combination , Interleukin-2 , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Interleukin-2/administration & dosage , Interleukin-2/adverse effects , Interleukin-2/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(18): e38002, 2024 May 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701278

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of different biological agents (infliximab, canakinumab, baricitinib, anakinra, adalimumab, tofacitinib, tocilizumab, and rilonacept) compared with placebo for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients, through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to July 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing different biological agents (infliximab, canakinumab, baricitinib, anakinra, adalimumab, tofacitinib, tocilizumab, and rilonacept) or placebo directly or indirectly in JIA. Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted. Data was extracted and analyzed by R with gemtc package. The treatment options were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value. RESULTS: We identified 10 randomized controlled trials and analyzed 898 participants. Canakinumab (odds ratio 55.0, 95% credible intervals 2.4-67.0) was more effective than the placebo, and the difference was statistically significant. However, there was no statistical significance between other drugs versus placebo in terms of the modified ACRpedi30 (P > .05). The SUCRA shows that canakinumab ranked first (SUCRA, 86.9%), anakinra ranked second (SUCRA, 77.7%), adalimumab ranked third (SUCRA, 61.9%), and placebo ranked the last (SUCRA, 6.3%). Nevertheless, there were no notable discrepancies in the occurrence of adverse events, hepatic-related adverse events, infectious adverse event, serious adverse events, and serious infection following treatment with canakinumab, anakinra, tocilizumab, rilonacept, or the placebo. Based on the clustergram of modified ACRpedi30 and adverse events, canakinumab is suggested for JIA according to the surface under SUCRAs considering the symptom and adverse events simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with JIA, canakinumab exhibited the highest likelihood of being the optimal treatment for achieving the modified ACRpedi30 response rate, and neither of the tested biological agents carried a significant risk of serious adverse events.


Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Juvenile , Network Meta-Analysis , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Humans , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Adalimumab/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/therapeutic use , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/adverse effects , Bayes Theorem
11.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 72(3): 40-46, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736116

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor therapy for most common rheumatological diseases, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in controlled clinical trials is well-studied. This study evaluated subcutaneous (SC) golimumab in Indian patients with active spondyloarthritis (SpA) of AS or PsA in a real-world setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 4, multicenter, prospective, non-comparative, interventional, 24-week study was performed in patients (age ≥18 years) with active SpA of AS or PsA (NCT03733925). Golimumab 50 mg was given subcutaneously to the patients every 4 weeks. Safety was assessed. The proportion of patients with AS and PsA achieving ≥20% improvement in the Assessment of SpA International Society 20 (ASAS20) criteria and American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) responses, respectively, at weeks 14 and 24 were efficacy endpoints. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients enrolled (men: 78 [78.0%]; mean age: 36.7 [12.02] years), 94 (94.0%) patients completed the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events with golimumab were observed in 29/100 (29.0%) patients, and nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection (5.0% each) were the most common (≥5%). Deaths were not reported. At week 14, 74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.7; 86.1%) of patients with AS and 84.6% (95% CI: 69.5; 94.1%) of patients with PsA achieved ASAS20 and ACR20 responses, which were sustained at week 24 (ASAS20: 66.0% [95% CI: 50.7, 79.1%]; ACR20: 93.2% [95% CI: 81.3, 98.6%]), respectively. CONCLUSION: Golimumab (50 mg) administered subcutaneously was safe and effective in Indian patients with active SpA of AS or PsA during the 24-week study period with no new safety signals.


Antibodies, Monoclonal , Arthritis, Psoriatic , Spondylitis, Ankylosing , Humans , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Male , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Female , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/drug therapy , India , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Injections, Subcutaneous , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects
12.
RMD Open ; 10(2)2024 Apr 30.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688692

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether prednisone use and/or disease activity score (DAS) are associated with the development of hyperglycaemia and diabetes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We included 504 non-diabetic early RA patients from the BeSt study (Dutch acronym for treatment strategies). Patients were randomised to four DAS-steered treatment arms and followed for 10 years. The associations between DAS and prednisone use with glucose levels and the occurrence of hyperglycaemia over time were assessed with linear and logistic mixed effects regression models. Development of diabetes was analysed with Cox regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed in patients who had a first episode of hyperglycaemia. RESULTS: 31 of 504 patients (6.2%) with a mean age of 54 years developed diabetes during follow-up; 11 of these (35%) had received prior treatment with prednisone. Prednisone use was not associated with development of hyperglycaemia or diabetes after correction for multiple testing in main or sensitivity analyses. In the main analyses, DAS was significantly associated with development of diabetes (HR 1.802 per 1 point DAS increase, 95% CI 1.284 to 2.529) but not with glucose levels nor hyperglycaemia. In patients with previous hyperglycaemia, DAS was associated with glucose levels, recurrence of hyperglycaemia and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In non-diabetic early RA patients, the use of prednisone was not associated with developing hyperglycaemia or diabetes. However, high DAS increased the risk of diabetes. Potential risks associated with prednisone use may have been mitigated by its effect on DAS.


Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Hyperglycemia , Prednisone , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Prednisone/adverse effects , Hyperglycemia/epidemiology , Hyperglycemia/etiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/etiology , Severity of Illness Index , Aged , Blood Glucose , Adult , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Risk Factors
13.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 42(5): 1043-1050, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38634362

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of filgotinib, a JAK1 preferential inhibitor, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients included in Italian GISEA (Group for the Study of Early Arthritis) registry. METHODS: Data from RA patients treated with filgotinib, recorded in the GISEA registry, were analysed. Disease activity scores and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed at baseline, as well as during 12-month follow-up. A difficult-to-treat (D2T) RA patient was defined according with EULAR criteria. Retention rate of filgotinib was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and factors influencing drug discontinuation were estimated by Cox regression models. RESULTS: 246 RA patients (female 89%, 57.6±12.2 years old) started filgotinib, mostly as second (22%) or further (43.9%) b/tsDMARDs line of treatment. At 3 and 12 months, 18.8% and 27.5% of patients achieved Clinical Diseases Activity Index based remission and 30.1% and 37.7% obtained a visual analogue scale of pain ≤20 (all p<0.01 vs. baseline). Filgotinib survival rate was 84.5% at the 6-month and 75.8% at 12-month follow-up, and was comparable either in monotherapy or combination therapy, and irrespective of glucocorticoid intake. b/tsDMARD naive patients had the lowest hazard ratio (HR) of filgotinib discontinuation (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.14-0.64), while D2T-RA the highest (HR 1.82, 95%CI 1.01-3.3). Eight patients (3.3%) discontinued filgotinib due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In an Italian real-life setting, filgotinib is confirmed to be safe and with a good effectiveness profile both in monotherapy and without glucocorticoids.


Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Registries , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Adult , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Triazoles/adverse effects , Italy , Remission Induction , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyridines/adverse effects , Time Factors , Patient Reported Outcome Measures
14.
RMD Open ; 10(2)2024 Apr 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609319

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of tuberculosis associated with the use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in South Korea. METHODS: In this nationwide matched-cohort study, we retrospectively identified adult patients with new-onset RA from the National Health Insurance Service database who were prescribed bDMARDs or JAK inhibitors and recently underwent latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening during 2012‒2021, and followed them up until the end of 2022 for the development of active tuberculosis. HRs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression in a propensity score-matched cohort. RESULTS: Among 16 760 matched patients with RA (3352 JAK inhibitor users and 13 408 bDMARD users), 18.8% received tuberculosis preventive therapy for LTBI. Overall, JAK inhibitor users had a significantly lower risk of tuberculosis than bDMARD users (HR (95% CI)=0.37 (0.22 to 0.62)). Among the patients treated for LTBI, patients with low treatment adherence had a significantly higher risk than those without LTBI (HR (95% CI)=2.78 (1.74 to 4.44)). Patients without LTBI and using JAK inhibitors had a significantly lower risk of tuberculosis across all ages and sexes compared with bDMARD users. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA using JAK inhibitors have a significantly lower risk of active tuberculosis than bDMARD users in South Korea; however, patients with RA having LTBI are equally at risk regardless of the treatment received (JAK inhibitor vs bDMARD). Therefore, vigilant tuberculosis monitoring, especially in patients with low adherence to tuberculosis preventive therapy, is essential.


Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Tuberculosis , Adult , Humans , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/etiology , Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology
16.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am ; 50(2): 337-357, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670731

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced malignancies often leads to off-target adverse events. Rheumatic immune-related adverse events can often linger beyond the duration of ICI therapy and sometimes requires the use of immunomodulator therapy. A key question, therefore, is if the commonly used therapies affect cancer outcomes. In this review, the authors summarize the state of the data as it currently stands, taking into consideration the limitations of the various source studies. The most information is known about glucocorticoids, which appear to be harmful especially when used early and at high doses.


Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Antirheumatic Agents , Glucocorticoids , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Neoplasms , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy
17.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 26(1): 87, 2024 Apr 17.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627782

BACKGROUND: We aimed to reveal the effect of abatacept (ABT) on atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, 3-year efficacy for arthritis, and safety in a population of older vs. younger patients. METHODS: In this open-label, prospective, observational study, patients were stratified into four groups: younger (20-64 years old) and older (≥ 65 years) patients taking ABT (AY and AO) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (CY and CO). Primary endpoints were change from baseline in mean intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery, IMT max (bulbus, bifurcation, and internal and common carotid artery), and plaque score at Week 156. Disease activity, retention rate, and adverse effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: The ABT group (AY + AO) tended to have smaller increases in mean IMT, max IMT, and plaque score than the csDMARD group (CY + CO) at Week 156, although the differences between groups were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed significantly lower increases in plaque score with ABT than with csDMARDs, only when considering disease activity at 156 weeks (p = 0.0303). Proportions of patients with good or good/moderate European League Against Rheumatism response were higher in the ABT group, without significant difference between older and younger patients. No significant differences were observed in ABT retention rates between older and younger patients. Serious adverse effects, especially infection, tended to be more frequent with ABT than with csDMARDs, although no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: ABT may decelerate atherosclerosis progression and may be useful for patients with high risk of cardiovascular disease, such as older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000014913.


Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Atherosclerosis , Humans , Aged , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Abatacept/adverse effects , Carotid Intima-Media Thickness , Prospective Studies , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
18.
RMD Open ; 10(2)2024 Apr 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599654

BACKGROUND: The REDO trial (REtreatment with Rituximab in RhEmatoid arthritis: Disease Outcome after Dose Optimisation) showed similar disease activity for retreatment with ultralow doses (200 mg and 500 mg per 6 months) compared with standard low-dose rituximab (RTX, 1000 mg per 6 months). We performed an observational extension study of the REDO trial to assess long-term effectiveness. METHODS: Patients from the REDO trial were followed from start of the trial to censoring in April 2021. RTX use was at the discretion of patient and rheumatologist using treat to target. The primary outcome was disease activity (disease activity score in 28 joints C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP)), analysed using a longitudinal mixed model by original randomisation and time-varying RTX dose. The original DAS28-CRP non-inferiority (NI) margin of 0.6 was used. RTX dose and persistence, safety and radiological outcomes were also assessed. FINDINGS: Data from 126 of 142 REDO patients was collected from 15 December 2016, up to 30 April 2021. Drop-outs continued treatment elsewhere (n=3) or did not consent (n=13).Disease activity did not differ by original randomisation group: 1000 mg mean DAS28-CRP (95% CI) of 2.2 (2.0 to 2.5), 500 mg 2.3 (2.1 to 2.4) and 200 mg 2.4 (2.2 to 2.5). Lower time-varying RTX dose was associated with higher DAS28-CRP (0.22 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.40) higher for 200 mg/6 months compared with 1000 mg/6 months), but remained within the NI-margin. RTX persistence was 93%. Median RTX dose was 978 mg (IQR 684-1413) per year, and no association was found between RTX dose and adverse events or radiological damage. INTERPRETATION: Long-term use of ultralow doses of RTX is effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis responding to standard dose RTX.


Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Humans , Rituximab/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Radiography
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 7674, 2024 04 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561370

In the absence of evidence-based guidance on the impact of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood concentration on efficacy and ocular toxicity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the clinical monitoring of HCQ blood concentration is not yet widely performed, which raised concerns about the necessity of conducting HCQ blood concentration monitoring. In this retrospective study, we consecutively enrolled 135 patients with SLE who received HCQ treatment for more than 6 months from July 2022 to December 2022. Ocular toxicity was evaluated by collecting relevant retinal parameters using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated using the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) and relevant clinical parameters. HCQ blood concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the cumulative dose of HCQ was positively correlated with the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) perimeter and FAZ area (r = 0.734, P < 0.001; r = 0.784, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the treatment duration of HCQ was positively correlated with FAZ perimeter and FAZ area (r = 0.761, P < 0.001; r = 0.882, P < 0.001). The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that HCQ blood concentration was associated with the disease activity of patients with SLE (odds ratio 0.994, 95% CI 0.990-0.999). HCQ blood concentration may be an important factor in assessing the therapeutic effectiveness of SLE patients. The HCQ-related ocular toxicity was a long-term effect related to long term exposure, rather than the blood concentration of HCQ at the time of testing. More importantly, when addressing HCQ-related ocular toxicity, it may be crucial to pay attention to the cumulative dose and treatment duration of HCQ.


Antirheumatic Agents , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Retrospective Studies , Toxic Optic Neuropathy/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy
20.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1376476, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38680499

Introduction: JAK-inhibitors (JAK-i) represent an effective treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Oral glucocorticoids (OGC) are commonly used in combination with JAK-i to reach therapeutic target. We aimed to assess, in a real-life setting, the reduction of OGC dose during JAK-i treatment in active RA and PsA patients. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 103 patients (88 RA, 15 PsA) treated with JAK-i: 24% bio-naïve (b-naïve), 76% bDMARD-insufficient responders (bDMARD-IR) and 40% difficult to treat (D2T), defined as failure of ≥2 bDMARDs with different mechanism of action. Disease activity (DAS28 and DAPSA, VAS-pain, GH) and OGC dose was collected at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months (T3, T6, T12) of treatment. Results: In all the cohort and in b-naïve patients we reported a reduction of OGC dose at all time-points; bDMARD-IR patients were able to reduce OGC dose at T3 and T12; D2T ones only at T3. We reported an improvement of disease activity and withdrawal of OGC as early as three months of therapy, at all time-points, regardless of line of bDMARD treatment. Conclusion: Chronic OGC may cause detrimental bone, metabolic, cardiovascular side effects and infections; therefore JAK-i steroid-sparing effect may be beneficial for patients in long-term treatment.


Arthritis, Psoriatic , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Male , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Female , Middle Aged , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Aged , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Administration, Oral
...